Report AI visibility in a way clients can understand and approve.

VectorGap turns prompt evidence, provider variance, competitor preference, source gaps, missions, and retests into client-ready reporting assets. Reporting only creates buyer value when the report proves the evidence, reduces payment risk, and supports recurring delivery capacity.

  • Perception shows what AI answers currently say: how systems describe, trust, price, and recommend the brand.
  • Preference shows which brand AI chooses when the client is compared with named competitors, and which proof gap made the choice easier.
  • The Generative Brand Index summarizes Presence, Perception, Preference, AI Readiness, missing evidence, and confidence in one executive 0-100 view.
  • Presence and AI Readiness explain whether the brand appears for buyer problems and whether current market proof can be retrieved, cited, and defended; missions, retests, and exports turn the gap into agency work.

7

standard providers

98

LLM prompts

40

Preference prompts

0-100

Generative Brand Index

Executive layer

Risk + next action

The report starts with the business risk, competitor pressure, and the few remediation actions the client can approve.

Evidence layer

Answer excerpts

Prompt, provider, answer, source, competitor, market, and score context stay attached so the finding is inspectable.

Closeout layer

Mission → retest

Completed work and comparable retests turn the next report into proof of movement, not a static dashboard screenshot.

What a strong report includes

The report should prove the gap, explain the cause, show the action, and define the retest.

Executive summary

Clear business risk, competitor pressure, and next actions the client can approve.

Evidence appendix

Prompt, provider, answer, source, competitor, market, persona, and score context.

Mission plan

Prioritized remediation actions, owners, target surfaces, and comparable retest targets.

Which evidence does AI need before it can reuse the page?

This table turns the page into a structured extraction target: the buyer question, the evidence an AI system can read, and the action an agency can sell or execute next.

Buyer questionWhat AI can extractAgency action
What should the client understand first?A concise executive summary that connects AI-answer risk, competitor pressure, and recommended remediation.Lead with the decision and next action before showing detailed evidence.
What evidence supports the claim?Provider answer excerpts, prompt categories, source gaps, competitor context, and target market/persona details.Use evidence excerpts as the appendix, not raw JSON or internal payloads.
How does the report create next scope?Missions, completed fixes, comparable retest targets, unresolved gaps, and expected next metrics.Close with approved remediation work, retest timing, and the next client-ready report.

Questions agencies ask before turning AI visibility into client work

What makes an AI visibility report client-ready?

It explains the business risk first, then shows answer excerpts, source gaps, competitor context, remediation missions, and the retest plan in language a client can approve.

Should agencies include raw prompt payloads in reports?

No. Use client-safe answer excerpts and evidence summaries. Keep raw payloads and internal debugging details out of client-facing reports unless the client explicitly needs them.