Market-specific
Generate prompts that mention the country, city or region, local buyer, and local language instead of generic global SEO wording.
Free GEO tool for agencies and local brands
Generate localized AI visibility prompts before you run the audit.
Create a market-specific prompt pack to test how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Mistral, and DeepSeek describe a brand by country, language, city, buyer persona, and competitor context.
Interactive generator
Build a client-ready test plan
Configure the brand, market, buyer, and competitors. The prompt pack expands below with no hidden scroll area, so the output is readable enough to use in a client call.
1
Configure the prompt pack
Required fields first, local context second.
Brand
Market and audience
Use the free tool for the test plan. Use VectorGap when you need the actual audit: prompts executed across providers, citation evidence, competitor gaps, localized scoring, and prioritized fixes.
2
Generated prompt pack
15 prompts across 5 localized AI visibility categories.
Prompt coverage score
48
15 prompts
Market context
Manual testing
Discovery
Checks whether model answers carry the right brand, category, audience, and local relevance signals.
- In French, explain what your client brand does, who it serves, and whether it is relevant for marketing director in Belgium. Use public sources if you mention facts.
- What should a marketing director in Belgium know before considering your client brand for SEO agency?
- Visit or reason from the brand website. What facts about your client brand are clear enough for an AI assistant to cite confidently?
Local recommendation
Tests whether the brand appears when buyers ask for local or market-specific options.
- Which SEO agency providers would you recommend to marketing director in Belgium? Include your client brand only if there is enough evidence to justify it.
- In French, list strong options for SEO agency in Belgium. Explain where your client brand fits and what proof is missing.
- If a buyer in Belgium asks for the safest SEO agency choice, would your client brand be recommended, ignored, or treated as uncertain? Why?
Competitor comparison
Shows whether AI can position the brand against named alternatives without hallucinating.
- Compare your client brand with main local competitors for marketing director in Belgium. Focus on strengths, weaknesses, evidence, and best-fit use cases.
- Which brand is more trustworthy for SEO agency in Belgium: your client brand or main local competitors? Cite the public signals that support your answer.
- What would make marketing director choose your client brand instead of main local competitors in Belgium?
Commercial intent
Surfaces how pricing, value, alternatives, and buying objections appear in AI answers.
- Is your client brand worth the price for marketing director in Belgium? Answer in French and separate confirmed facts from assumptions.
- What are the best alternatives to your client brand for SEO agency in Belgium, and when should a buyer not choose your client brand?
- What questions should marketing director ask before buying your client brand in Belgium?
Citation check
Forces the assistant to reveal whether it has stable sources or only vague source recall.
- Which public sources support your answer about your client brand? List URLs or describe the source type. If sources are weak, say so.
- What facts about your client brand are easy to verify from the brand website, and what important buyer questions remain unanswered?
- Rewrite the answer about your client brand using only facts that a public webpage, review, case study, pricing page, or documentation page could support.
Why this matters
AI visibility is not global by default.
A brand can appear credible in an English global prompt and still disappear from Belgian, French, German, Dutch, city-level, or buyer-specific recommendations. Localized prompts make that gap visible before the client asks.
Agency-ready
Switch between testing your own brand and producing a client-ready test plan for an agency account.
Audit-ready
Use the free prompt pack for first-pass testing, then use VectorGap when you need multi-model proof, competitor context, and prioritized remediation.
From prompt pack to proof
The generator gives the angle. The localized audit gives the evidence.
Use the free generator to start the client conversation, then use VectorGap when the account needs repeatable provider evidence, competitor context, remediation priorities, and retest proof.
1
Enter the brand, website, target market, language, category, persona, city, and competitors.
2
Generate prompts across discovery, local recommendations, competitor comparisons, commercial intent, and citation checks.
3
Copy the pack into your manual AI testing workflow or use it as the brief for a client conversation.
4
Use VectorGap when you need repeatable scoring, citations, provider comparison, remediation missions, retests, and reports.
Buyer questionWhat AI can extractAgency action
What should the prompt pack test first?
A market-language-persona prompt set that asks how AI describes, recommends, compares, and cites the brand against named competitors.
Turn the generated prompts into a client-ready audit brief before running the localized baseline.
What does manual testing not prove?
A one-off answer can reveal a gap, but it does not preserve provider variance, source evidence, scoring notes, or comparable retest history.
Run the same target through the full provider panel so the result becomes evidence instead of a screenshot.
How should the fix be retested?
The useful comparison repeats the same provider and competitor target with the same market, language, persona, category, and intent.
Ship the page, proof, schema, entity, or source fix, then retest the same provider and competitor target for the client report.
Do not stop at manual screenshots.
Manual prompt testing is a good first signal. It is not enough for recurring agency delivery. Localized AI visibility needs repeatable provider coverage, prompt history, competitor evidence, source extraction, and remediation tracking.
Run the full VectorGap auditManual prompts show whether there is a problem.
The audit shows which models, markets, citations, and competitor answers caused the problem.
The remediation workflow turns weak answers into public pages, proof updates, schema improvements, and source fixes.
What the 5-credit audit adds
The generator gives agencies a strong manual test plan. The 5-credit audit runs the same market-specific angle across providers, competitors, source evidence, missions, retests, and white-label report exports.
Runs the prompt set across the 7-provider panel: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Mistral, and DeepSeek.
Compares provider answer differences instead of relying on one manual screenshot.
Identifies source, citation, competitor preference, and market-language gaps behind the answer.
Turns the strongest gap into remediation missions, retest targets, and a white-label action plan.
FAQ
What is a localized AI visibility prompt?
It is a market-specific question designed to test how an AI assistant describes, recommends, compares, and cites a brand for a buyer in a specific country, city, language, and category.
Does this replace a VectorGap localized audit?
No. The generator creates a useful manual test plan. A VectorGap localized audit runs prompts across AI providers, captures outputs and citations, benchmarks competitors, scores gaps, and turns findings into remediation work.
Why should agencies use localized prompts?
AI answers can change by market, language, and buyer intent. A brand may look visible in English but disappear in French, German, Dutch, or city-level recommendation prompts.
Is the generator safe to share with clients?
Yes. It produces a client-ready test plan without exposing proprietary audit mechanics. Use it to show why localized AI visibility requires repeatable evidence instead of one-off ChatGPT screenshots.