The Share of Model Report: Decoding the Hidden AI Recommendation Economy
Why Share of Model is the new North Star for B2B growth and brand reputation in the age of Generative Engine Optimization.

The Death of the Click and the Rise of the Consensus
For two decades, the digital marketing economy was built on a simple premise: rank for a keyword, earn a click, and drive a conversion. But in 2025, that linear journey has fractured. Today, your prospective buyer isn’t just scrolling through blue links; they are asking Perplexity to compare your software against three competitors, or asking Claude to summarize the sentiment of your latest product reviews.
In this new paradigm, traditional SEO metrics like domain authority and organic traffic are becoming secondary indicators. The metric that actually defines market leadership today is Share of Model (SoM).
Share of Model measures the frequency, sentiment, and authoritative weight your brand carries within the latent space of Large Language Models (LLMs). It is the data-driven reality of how AI perceives your brand—and by extension, how it recommends you to the world. If you aren't in the model, you don't exist in the recommendation engine.
Why Share of Model is the Only Metric That Matters for 2025
As Generative Search Engines (GSEs) become the primary interface for information retrieval, the "winner-take-all" effect has intensified. While Google’s first page offered ten spots, an LLM often provides only three recommendations.
Share of Model metrics represent the evolution of Share of Voice. It isn't just about being mentioned; it’s about being contextually relevant within the specific vector space of a buyer’s intent.
According to recent industry shifts, nearly 40% of users are now starting high-intent product searches on AI-native platforms. For growth teams, this means: The End of Passive Presence: Simply having a website is no longer enough. If your brand isn't part of the LLM’s training data or its retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline, you are invisible to a growing segment of the market. The Shift to Semantic Authority: LLMs don't look for keywords; they look for relationships. SoM tracks how closely your brand is mathematically clustered with positive attributes and industry-leading solutions.
Analyzing the Mathematical Distance: Why You’re Not in the Top 3
To understand why an AI recommends a competitor over you, we have to look at mathematical distance in vector embeddings. When a user asks, "What is the most reliable CRM for mid-market manufacturing?", the LLM navigates a multi-dimensional map of data points.
The Exclusion Zone If your brand is excluded from the "Top 3" recommendations, it’s rarely a random error. It is usually a result of a "Vector Gap." This happens when the model perceives a vast distance between your brand’s content and the high-authority clusters it trusts.
Common reasons for exclusion include: Fragmented Narrative: Your website says one thing, but third-party reviews and industry journals say another. This lack of consensus creates "noise" that causes the LLM to prioritize more consistent competitors. Citation Poverty: AI engines rely on a web of trust. If the sources the LLM deems authoritative (e.g., Gartner, specialized trade pubs, high-quality GitHub repos) aren't mentioning you, the model won't bridge that gap on its own. Low Semantic Density:
- Your content may be optimized for human readability but lacks the structured data and clear entity relationships that allow an LLM to categorize you accurately.
Trend Analysis: Hallucinations and Brand Reputation in Gemini and Claude
One of the most significant risks for brand managers in 2025 is the "hallucination gap." This is where an AI incorrectly characterizes a brand’s features, pricing, or reputation.
Through our LLM sentiment analysis, we’ve observed distinct patterns in how different models handle brand data:
Gemini: The Ecosystem Bias Google’s Gemini tends to prioritize data within the broader Google ecosystem. If your brand has a weak presence in Google Scholar, YouTube, or Google Maps, Gemini is more likely to "hallucinate" a lack of capability or suggest a more visible competitor. Hallucinations here often manifest as omissions—the model simply acts as if your latest pivot or product launch never happened.
Claude: The Ethical Concensus Anthropic’s Claude places a high premium on safety and consensus. If there is a historical record of PR issues or negative sentiment in your brand’s past, Claude may "over-index" on these risks, leading to a recommendation that includes a caveat about your brand’s reliability.
For reputation managers, monitoring these patterns is critical. You cannot "delete" a hallucination; you can only overwhelm it with high-authority, semantically consistent data that forces the model to realign its weights during the next fine-tuning or RAG cycle.
How Content Strategists Must Pivot to AI-Readability
Traditional keyword-to-intent mapping is being replaced by Vector-based content strategy. To win the Share of Model race, content must be engineered for both the human reader and the generative engine.
1. Entity-Based Optimization: Move beyond keywords to entities. Ensure your content clearly defines what you are, who you serve, and how you relate to other established entities in your space. 2. Bridging the Citation Gap: Identify which sources the AI is citing most frequently in your niche. If Perplexity is constantly citing a specific industry blog, your top priority should be a guest feature or a mention on that specific site to enter the model’s "trust vector." 3. Structured Data as a Foundation: Use Schema markup not just for rich snippets, but as a roadmap for LLMs to ingest your brand’s facts without ambiguity.
Competitive Intelligence in the Recommendation Economy
For SaaS and E-commerce growth teams, competitive intelligence has moved from "What are they bidding on?" to "Why does the AI think they are better?"
By using AI search intelligence, teams can now perform a gap analysis on their competitors' vector space. If a competitor is consistently recommended for "ease of use," you can analyze the specific clusters of data—customer reviews, documentation, and forum discussions—that helped the model arrive at that conclusion.
This isn't just about marketing; it’s about product-market fit as perceived by the world’s most powerful information brokers.
The Path Forward: Owning Your Vector
The AI recommendation economy is not a black box; it is a measurable, influenceable system. Brands that ignore their Share of Model today will find themselves locked out of the buyer’s journey by 2026.
To lead your category, you must move beyond the click. You must understand the mathematical relationships that define your brand in the eyes of the machine. You must close the gap between who you say you are and who the AI tells the world you are.
Is your brand being recommended, or is it being left behind?
At VectorGap.ai, we provide the visibility you need to navigate the LLM landscape. From tracking Share of Model metrics to identifying the citation gaps that are costing you market share, our platform is built for the next era of growth.
[Analyze Your Share of Model Today – Get a Demo of VectorGap]
Ready to monitor your AI perception?
See exactly what ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini say about your brand.
Get Started Free